Proof of learning.
Taqyeem connects every course, assessment and review to the outcomes your programs promise, so you can show what students actually learned, every term, not only in accreditation year.
From one section’s marks to the whole institution.
Faculty upload each section’s marks once. Taqyeem shows how the students did on each course learning outcome (CLO): something a course should teach. It carries those results into the program learning outcomes (PLOs): what every graduate should be able to do. Then it puts every program side by side, every term.
01CourseCIVE 315 · S01
Did this section’s students learn what CLO 2 asks?
CLO 2
78.40Meets target
Average score, against a target of 70
31 students, from one marks spreadsheet
02ProgramBSc Civil Engineering
Are students reaching PLO 3 across all its courses?
PLO 3
71.06Below target
Average score, against a target of 73
201 of 345 student results reached 73
From 4 courses and 7 sections this term
03InstitutionFall 2026
Has every section sent its report, and on time?
Reports sent
46of 48 sections
41 on time · 38 approved
Across 3 colleges and 12 programs
One term, start to finish.
Taqyeem follows the steps your institution already takes each term. Set up courses once. Faculty report on their sections. A reviewer reads every report. Then everyone sees the results and what needs attention.
Set up programs and courses
Add your colleges, departments and programs. Write down what each course should teach (its CLOs) and what each program should teach (its PLOs). Then click a grid to link each CLO to the PLOs it supports, as a High, Medium or Low link. Changes stay in a draft until you publish them as a new version, and one list shows the courses that still need links.
Who: Administrators and program coordinators
DraftCIVE 315 · Structural analysis
BSc Civil Engineering · version 3
CLOCourse outcome PLO 1 PLO 2 PLO 3 PLO 4 PLO 5 PLO 6 CLO 1 H M · · · · CLO 2 · · H L · · CLO 3 M · · H · · CLO 4 · · L · M · LLowMMediumHHighPLO 6 is not linked from this course yetFig. 2One course’s grid: each click links a course outcome to a program outcome as Low, Medium or High. Get the term ready
Add the courses taught this term, their sections and their teachers. When programs share a course, each adds its own list of students to it. A checklist shows what is still missing. Teachers see a section as soon as they are assigned to it.
Who: Administrators, department heads and coordinators
CIVE 315 · Fall 2026
Structural analysis · 2 sections · 2 programs
- Course outcomes publishedVersion 2
- Outcomes linked for each program2 of 2 programs
- Sections addedS01 and S02
- A main instructor for each section2 of 2 sections
- Student lists published1 of 2 programs
- Who may teach is setFaculty and adjunct faculty
- Reviewer chosenOne reviewer
Fig. 3Setup checks for one course this term. Each line is worked out from the course’s records, not ticked by hand. Faculty report on each section
Each teacher opens their section and answers a few questions about how the course went. They upload the marks spreadsheet (the assessment matrix) from the template, and Taqyeem works out the results for every CLO and for each program’s PLOs. They add a short reflection and send the report. The version they send is kept exactly as it was.
Who: Faculty members
In progressCIVE 315 · S01
Structural analysis · Fall 2026
Assessment matrixResultsReflectionOutcome Average Target Result CLO 1 81.25 70 Meets target CLO 2 78.40 70 Meets target CLO 3 64.10 70 Below target CLO 4 72.86 70 Meets target BSc Civil Engineering · 24 students PLO 1 74.02 73 Meets target PLO 3 69.47 73 Below target Fig. 4The Results step of a section report: each CLO’s average score against its target, then the PLOs for one program’s students. Illustrative figures. Review and approval
Each report goes to a reviewer, who approves it or asks for changes with a comment. The teacher answers and sends it again. Every comment, answer and decision is kept. An approved report can be downloaded as a package that matches exactly what was approved. Semester overview shows which sections have sent their report and which have not.
Who: Reviewers, the quality office and faculty
ApprovedReview · CIVE 315 · S01
Structural analysis · Fall 2026
Sent for reviewMon 16:05
Version 1 · Faculty member
Changes requestedThu 10:20
CLO 3 is below target. Please explain why in your reflection, and say what you will change next term.
Reviewer
Sent againFri 09:12
Version 2 · Added the CLO 3 explanation and next term’s change. · Faculty member
ApprovedMon 11:48
Package matches version 2 · Reviewer
Fig. 5A report’s review history: every request, answer and decision is kept, and the approved version is fixed. See results and act
Analytics shows two numbers for every outcome: the average score against its target, and how many student results reached that target. Beside them are how many reports came in on time and how long reviews took. Any number opens a page that shows how it was worked out. You are notified when sections miss the deadline, a review is late or a course is not linked to any PLO.
Who: Coordinators, the quality office and deans
PLO 3
BSc Civil Engineering · Fall 2026 · approved reports
Average score
71.06Below target
Target 73 · 345 student results
Reached the target
58.26%
201 of 345 student results
How this was calculated
- 1
Add up every student result for PLO 3, then divide by the number of results.
24,515.30 ÷ 345 = 71.06
71.0588… is less than 73, so it is below target.
- 2
Count the results of 73 or more.
201 ÷ 345 = 58.26%
Fig. 6One program outcome in two numbers, with the working behind them, and the notifications that ask for action. Illustrative figures. - 1
Everyone starts on their own work.
Each person sees only the pages their job needs, in one menu with one search box. Administrators make the roles and choose where each one applies: a college, a department, a program or a course. Being assigned to teach a section is enough to open it. A role lent for a set time ends on its own.
Teaching
- Faculty member
- Reports on their own sections and answers reviewer comments.
- Starts on My teaching
- Course coordinator
- Runs a course’s sections each term and compares results across them.
- Starts on My courses
Programs and review
- Program coordinator
- Keeps the program’s courses and outcome links up to date and follows its results.
- Starts on My programs
- Reviewer
- Reads the reports sent to them, then approves them or asks for changes.
- Starts on Reviews
- Quality office
- Assigns reviewers, keeps their work balanced and follows progress across the institution.
- Starts on Review workload
Leadership and records
- Institution administrator
- Looks after colleges, programs, terms, people and their access.
- Starts on Semester overview
- Dean or provost
- Sees which programs have their courses and outcomes in place, and their results.
- Starts on Catalog coverage
- Auditor
- Reads the record of every change, without changing anything.
- Starts on Activity
Results you can stand behind.
Reviewers and accreditors will ask where a number came from. Taqyeem keeps the answer as the work happens.
Your institution’s data stays yours
Every person, report, file and number belongs to your institution. The database itself refuses to mix it with another institution’s, and no page shows anyone else’s data.
Every change is recorded
Changes to programs, courses, terms, people and settings are kept with who made them and when. Auditors can read this record but cannot change it.
Every number shows its working
Open any outcome figure to see the sum behind it in words and numbers, what was counted, what was left out, and the sections it came from.
Sent reports stay as sent
A sent report is kept exactly as it was. Comments, answers and approvals are added beside it, never written over it.
Access follows the job
People get only the roles they need, for the places they work. A lent role ends on the date set, and teaching a section opens only that section.
Small groups stay private
When a group has fewer students than your institution allows, Taqyeem hides its results instead of showing them.
Activity
Whole institution · last 7 days
| When | What changed |
|---|---|
| Mon 09:42 | Outcome link changed CIVE 315 · CLO 3 to PLO 2 |
| Mon 09:15 | Role given Reviewer · College of Engineering |
| Fri 16:30 | Student list published BSc Civil Engineering · Fall 2026 |
| Thu 14:20 | Program courses published BSc Civil Engineering · version 3 |
| Wed 11:02 | Link weights published Low 1 · Medium 2 · High 3 |
Questions people ask.
- What does a teacher do each term?
- Open each section you teach. Answer a few questions about how the course went. Upload the marks spreadsheet from the template. Check the results, write a short reflection and send the report. Your work is saved as you go, and any reviewer comments come back to the same report.
- How are the results worked out?
- The marks spreadsheet gives each student a score for each CLO. Each PLO then combines the scores of the CLOs linked to it, counting a High link more than a Low one. Every figure shows the average against the target and how many results reached it, and you can open the full working.
- Can two programs share one course?
- Yes. The course belongs to one department and is taught once each term. Each program that uses it adds its own list of students. The teacher writes one report, and Taqyeem shows the results separately for each program’s students.
- What happens after a report is approved?
- The approved report stays in its history with the reviewer’s decision. People who are allowed can download it as a PDF, along with the teacher’s reflection and a package that matches exactly what was approved.
- Who can see each student’s results?
- Only people whose role allows it. Most people see totals and averages, and results for very small groups are hidden.
See a term in Taqyeem. We will walk you through it.
Tell us about your institution and we will find a time to show you a whole term, from setting up courses to an approved report.